tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5538168516484281571.post5411578313330340066..comments2018-07-16T03:31:52.190-07:00Comments on The Art of Thinking Praxis: Sicurezza all'aeroportoUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5538168516484281571.post-61745221410701255522011-06-10T12:18:16.372-07:002011-06-10T12:18:16.372-07:00uhuhu... well. if my english were only a bit bette...uhuhu... well. if my english were only a bit better... i might have a try... the translation engine is great... it leaves untouched all my spelling mistakes...<br />It's a bout Herr Kant. He has got this theory of "universalization of the law" - you know... a law must be appliable to everybody... But Herr Kant also thinks that one has to pay taxes for private property - in order to compensate a disobedience to the law in a sense. I mean: if i own this house, you don't: as easy as that. Therefore - he says - i must pay money (fees/taxes) so to balance my infraction. i wonder then if there is not an intimate paradox there: if after all whatever characterizes me must not be paid: if everything POSITIVE is left then to an economical consideration... Therefore: the universal law would be NEGATIVE, it sets the limit, but it's a limit which MUST be challanged by PRIVATE PROPERTY and whatever defines humans or animal POSITIVELY. So here we are... it seems that we find here open the possibility to sell and bay laws... isn't it?<br />The other point was about security. the way in order to have security working the secured must not be respected... nothing new... i know... I tried to match this point with above Herr Kant...<br />Just drafts of words...<br />Well---- thanks for your translinguistic desire!! Grazie assai!belvinohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13631885559949504290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5538168516484281571.post-77717099563425139452011-06-08T04:17:34.694-07:002011-06-08T04:17:34.694-07:00I want a translation toooo!
Trans-lation, trans-l...I want a translation toooo! <br />Trans-lation, trans-la-tion! Ah, translating machines....the proposal just below mentions them too somewhere around p.4? <br />The was language begins to conform to the possibility of being translated by a machine...<br />Here is the machinic-translation of the first 'paragraph' above:<br /><br />Wednesday, June 1, 2011Sicurezza airport <br />Airport security. The formal aspect of the law prescribing the universalizability. "Act so that you can will that the maxim of your actions become universal." Nothing that has conceded that it could be extended to all. Keeping property taxes imposed at the maximum offense needed, they mitigate the damage or result in liquids. Not only do they preclude the possession of the possessed object to those who are not owners, but the possession itself is based on a principle of exclusion. Duty and then are placed in well-being antagonistic in front of the capital. Cimpromesso solutions are at hand but the universal maxim inevitably arises as a paradox is instantiated every time. The most urgent question is posed in these terms: the capital is an issue still unresolved by the highest universal or it is the inevitable complement? In fact a formal and universalist vision that can not conceive of reality as relational capital property. Hence the apparent injustice of private property such as exposure of the same paradoxical logic fomrale. The property is an abuse against the universal maxim that the fees tries to compensate by including in its most profound contradiction. How peculiar, distinctive, individual properties of the individual are then subsumed under the logic of capital and at least submissive to taxation so that in fact the right to prorpria figure has to be acquired, being provided only for the birth of formal law and universal principle. The universal formal rights but not stop even to materialize in space / time of a body: the subject of formal rights do not extend even to the materialism of a physical perosna, without even mentioning its historical reality. In reality, the positive space is left completely in the capital management so that under the illusion of a formal negative freedom, freedom of living each practice and offer is subject to its economic value. The universal maxim establishes the economic value of freedom. Having exposed the accounts is to ask what could be a critical response alibi capitalist.Belvinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10353139594156329202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5538168516484281571.post-36557950722656544732011-06-07T10:11:52.721-07:002011-06-07T10:11:52.721-07:00i don't understand. ha ha. you should do an ...i don't understand. ha ha. you should do an english translation sometimes too i would love to know what it says! o i guess i could put it into google translation. love technology!ChicagoStacihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07763549928399925061noreply@blogger.com